Wright v. Stamper (INMATE 2)

Plaintiff: Carl W. Wright
Defendant: Dennis Stamper
Case Number: 2:2016cv00299
Filed: April 28, 2016
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Referring Judge: Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge: W. Harold Albritton
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 21, 2017 24 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDERING and ADJUDING that: (1) ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge; and (2) the petition for habeas relief filed by petitioner Carl Wright is DISMISSED as moot, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/21/17. (djy, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Stamper (INMATE 2)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carl W. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Stamper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?