Nalls v. Corizon Health, Inc.

Plaintiff: Wilma Nalls
Defendant: Corizon Health, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2016cv00391
Filed: May 31, 2016
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Presiding Judge: W. Harold Albritton
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 10, 2017 27 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Corizon's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 14 ) is DENIED as to Count I; 2. Corizon's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 14 ) is GRANTED as to Counts II, III, and V; and 3. The case will proceed on the Plaintiff's claim of hostile work environment. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 8/10/2017. (kh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nalls v. Corizon Health, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wilma Nalls
Represented By: Patricia Anne Gill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corizon Health, Inc.
Represented By: Philip Guy Piggott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?