Sewell v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Plaintiff: Timothy Jevon Sewell
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2016cv00460
Filed: June 20, 2016
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Susan Russ Walker
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 28, 2016 15 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED as follows: (1) Petitioner Timothy Jevon Sewell's 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody is GRANTED. (2) The sentence, entered in United States v. Sewe ll, No. 2:03-CR-232 (M.D. Ala. Oct. 26, 2005), is VACATED.(3) A resentencing hearing in United States v. Sewell, No. 2:03-CR-232, is set on 1/13/2017, at 10:30 a.m., in courtroom 2-B of the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse, in Montgomery, Alabam a. Sewell shall remain in custody pending resentencing. The United States Marshal is DIRECTED to arrange for Sewells appearance at this hearing, and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to provide a court reporter. (4) The deadlines in Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 32 are modified to expedite the resentencing hearing. The United States Probation Office shall prepare an addendum to the PSR, which includes information on Sewells post-conviction conduct, and shall disclose the addendum to Defen dant, counsel for Defendant, the Government, and the court on or before 12/13/2016. Any objections to the PSR addendum shall be filed under seal on or before 12/20/2016. (5) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to file this Memorandum Opinion and Order , along with the accompanying Final Judgment, in United States v. Sewell, 2:03-CR-232 (M.D. Ala.). (6) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to furnish copies of this Order to counsel, to the United States Probation Office, and to the United States Marshal. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/28/2016. Copies furnished to AR, USM, counsel, and USPO as directed; copy furnished to Criminal.(dmn, )
August 29, 2016 11 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that a ruling on petitioner's 2255 MOTION is held in abeyance pending additional briefing from the parties; the parties are directed to file briefs on the issues set out in this opinion, and on any other issues the p arties deem relevant to resentencing, as further set out in order; briefs shall be filed on or before 9/8/2016. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/29/16. (djy, ) (Main Document 11 replaced on 8/29/2016 to correct typographical error in heading of main PDF document) (qc/djy, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sewell v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Jevon Sewell
Represented By: Patricia Vanessa Kemp(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Todd A. Brown(Designation Retained)
Represented By: Kevin P Davidson(Designation Retained)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?