Marshall v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
| Robert Marshall |
| United States of America |
| 2:2016cv00477 |
| June 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Talladega |
| Charles S. Coody |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER: Before the court is Petitioner Robert Marshall's motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP). (Doc. 76 .) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), it is ORDERED that Marshall's pro se motion for leave to appeal IFP (Doc. 76 ) is DE NIED. Based on the foregoing, Marshall is required, under 28 U.S.C. 1915, to pay the $505.00 fee for filing his notice of appeal as further set out in the order. To aid those persons having custody of Marshall in complying with the requirements of this order, the Clerk of this court is DIRECTED to furnish a copy of this order to the inmate account clerk at the federal correctional institution where Marshall is incarcerated. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/16/2022. Copy to account clerk at Federal Correctional Institution as directed. Furnished Appeals Clerk.(dmn, )
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER: Before the court is Petitioner's pro se Request for Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability, which is construed as a motion. (Doc. 68 .) It is ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 68 ) is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/2/2022. Furnished Appeals Clerk. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) Petitioner's 63 objection is OVERRULED; (2) The 62 Recommendation is ADOPTED; and (3) Petitioner's 61 nominal Rule 60(b)(6) motion is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; Final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/8/2022. (bes, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER construing the 48 Motion to contain a Motion for Certificate of Appealability ("CoA"); ORDER denying 48 Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment; ORDER denying 48 Motion for CoA and Petitioner is DENIED a CoA from the 45 Final Judgment and this Order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/28/2018. (alm, )
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that the 42 Recommendation is ADOPTED, the 43 objections are OVERRULED, the 1 28 USC 2255 motion is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; Final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/29/2018. (alm, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marshall v. United States of America (INMATE 3) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Marshall | |
| Represented By: | Patricia Vanessa Kemp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Verne H. Speirs |
| Represented By: | Sandra Jean Stewart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
