Chavez v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff:
John Candido Chavez
Defendant:
United States of America
Case Number:
2:2016cv00525
Filed:
June 29, 2016
Court:
Alabama Middle District Court
Office:
Montgomery Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge:
Terry F. Moorer
Presiding Judge:
W. Harold Albritton
Nature of Suit:
Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:
28:2255
Jury Demanded By:
None
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chavez v. United States of America (INMATE 3) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Candido Chavez | |
| Represented By: | Federal Defender(Designation Public Defender or Community Defender Appointment) |
| Represented By: | Christine Ann Freeman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Kevin P Davidson |
| Represented By: | Jonathan S. Ross |
| Represented By: | Verne H. Speirs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
