Mitchell v. State of Alabama Department of Labor et al(MAG+)
| Michal Ruth Mitchell |
| State of Alabama Department of Labor and Charles Timothy Delamar |
| 2:2016cv00666 |
| August 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Montgomery |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation (Doc. # 27 ) is ADOPTED. 2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Counts One and Three is DENIED. 3. The proceedings are referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for consideration and disposition or recommendation on all pretrial matters as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/26/2018. (kh, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER as follows: 1. Plaintiff's 12 Objection is OVERRULED. 2. The 10 Recommendation is ADOPTED. 3. Defendant Delamar's 7 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. 4. Plaintiff's Title VII claims against Defendant Charles Timothy Delamar are DISMISSED with prejudice. 5. There being no other claims currently pending against Defendant Charles Timothy Delamar, Defendant Charles Timothy Delamar is DISMISSED from this action. This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/2/2017. (dmn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
