Morrison v. Stamper (INMATE 1)

Plaintiff: Larry Morrison
Defendant: Dennis Stamper
Case Number: 2:2016cv00957
Filed: December 12, 2016
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
0 Judge: W. Harold Albritton
1 Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 29, 2018 55 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) Petitioner's 52 Objection to the Recommendation is OVERRULED; 2) The 51 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 3) The 28 USC 2241 1 petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED; 4) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/29/2018. (alm, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morrison v. Stamper (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larry Morrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis Stamper
Represented By: Tommie Brown Hardwick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?