Hampton v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 1)
Plaintiff: Lawrence Hampton
Defendant: Captain Baldwin, Edward Ellington, Officer Johnson, Officer Joushua, Officer Williams and Nurse Copeland
Case Number: 2:2016cv00973
Filed: December 16, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Elmore
Presiding Judge: W. Harold Albritton
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 161 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows that: 1) the 158 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) judgment is entered in favor of Captain Baldwin and against the Plf on the Plf's failure to protect claim; 3) judg ment is entered in favor of the Plf and against Officer Sanders on the Plf's excessive force claim; 4) the Plf is awarded One Thousand Dollars ($1000.00) in damages against Officer Sanders, for which Officer Sanders is liable in his individ ual capacity, and for which execution may issue. 5) Court costs in the amount of Three Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($350.00) are taxed against Officer Sanders, for which execution may issue. 6) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 9/16/2019. (cnw, )
July 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 152 OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1. that the 149 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2. the correctional defendants' motion for summary judgment with respect to the Plaintiff's claims seeking monetary damages from them in their official capacities is GRANTED and these claims are DISMISSED with prejudice as Warden Ellington, Captain Baldwin, and Officer Sanders are entitled to absolute immunity from such damages; 3. the motion for summary judgment filed o n behalf of the correctional defendants in their individual capacities as to the Plaintiff's excessive force claim against Officer Sanders and his failure to protect claim against Captain Baldwin is DENIED; 4. Warden Ellington's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 5. Nurse Sagers-Copeland's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 6. This case is REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for an evidentiary hearing on the Plaintiff's surviving claims of excessive force against Officer Sanders and failure to protect against Captain Baldwin for monetary damages in their individual capacities. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 7/15/2019. (kr, )
April 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER: Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. 118 .) No party filed an objection to the Recommendation. Based upon an independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The Recommendation (Doc. 118 ) i s ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiffs motion to dismiss (Doc. 117 ) is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Terry Edwards are DISMISSED without prejudice; (4) The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to reflect in the courts electronic record that, as o f todays date, Terry Edwards is terminated as a party to this action; and (5) This action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further appropriate proceedings against the remaining Defendants. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 4/26/2018. (dmn, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hampton v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 1)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lawrence Hampton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Captain Baldwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Edward Ellington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Joushua
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nurse Copeland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?