Hughes v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
| Tiffany Hughes |
| Wal-Mart Stores East, LP |
| 2:2017cv00225 |
| April 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Autauga |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12102 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 76 MOTION for Summary Judgment, as further set out in order; a final judgment will be entered by separate order. Signed by Honorable Judge Andrew L. Brasher on 11/14/19. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) Wal-Mart's 58 objections are OVERRULED; (2) the 48 motion to compel is GRANTED; (3) The orders of the Magistrate Judge (Docs. # 56 , 57 ) are ADOPTED, except that the deadlines for a jo int protective order and for production are modified below; (4) on or before 10/26/2018, plf and def Wal-Mart shall file a joint motion for a protective order that will govern production of customer-patient information; (5) on or before 11/2/2018 Def endant Wal-Mart shall produce to Plaintiff the names of any people including Wal-Mart's customerpatients who were at the pharmacy counter on 7/6/2016, when the discussion between Plaintiff and Defendant Hughes occurred; and (6) This case is again REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636 for further proceedings, determinations, and recommendations as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/15/18. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to why 63 Motion to Compel should not be granted; Show Cause Response due by 9/14/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 9/4/18. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to why 48 Motion to Compel should not be granted; Show Cause Response due by 7/13/2018. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 6/29/18. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
46
AMENDED UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER GRANTING 45 Joint MOTION for Extension of deadlines as follows: Section 2: Dispositive Motions 9/18/2018;Section 3: The Parties Settlement Conference 10/9/2018;Section 7: Discovery Cutoff 9/14/2018; advising the parties that the extensions may necessitate the entry of a new scheduling order at a later date depending on the Court's schedule. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 5/7/18. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER GRANTING 36 MOTION for leave; directing that on or before 3/9/2018, def shall file a reply to plfs' response to its motion to dismiss. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 2/22/18. (djy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hughes v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tiffany Hughes | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
