Cornett v. Alabama Department of Transportation (MAG+)
| James D. Cornett |
| Alabama Department of Transportation, Alabama State Personnel Department and Department of Corrections |
| 2:2017cv00335 |
| May 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Gray M. Borden |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
OPINION and ORDER directing as follows: (1) the plf's 48 objections be and are hereby OVERRULED; (2) the 46 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; (3) the defs' 12 Motion to Dismiss be and is hereby DENIED as moot; (4) the defs' 41 Motion to Dismiss the amended complaint be and is hereby GRANTED; (5) this case be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks on 11/7/18. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
21
JUDGMENT, upon consideration of plf's 20 motion for voluntary dismissal, which the court construes as a notice of dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), it is ORDERED that: (1) this lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety withou t prejudice, with no costs taxed; (2) all pending motions are denied as moot; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/5/17. (djy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
