Howard v. Scruggs et al (INMATE 1)
| Daron Durane Howard |
| David Scruggs, Wonda Craft and Chris Byrd |
| 2:2017cv00482 |
| July 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Covington |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Wallace Capel |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The 7 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and Mr. Howard-Bey's 8 , 9 , 12 , & 13 objections to the Recommendation are OVERRULED; 2) Mr. Howard-Bey's claims seeking intervention by this court in his pending state criminal cases are DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with the Younger abstention doctrine; 3) Mr. Howard-Bey's claims seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from the orders setting bail in his criminal cases are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court in this action; 4) Mr. Howard-Bey's Miranda claim is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 US C 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 5) Mr. Howard-Bey's 2 motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED as he has failed to show a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; and 6) This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii). Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/10/2017. (wcl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
