Griffin v. Walker et al (INMATE 1)
James Griffin |
Clifford Walker, Parole Board Review Committee, Terry Davis and Lynn Head |
2:2018cv00791 |
September 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Charles S Coody |
Myron H Thompson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER construing response as a motion for service of documents; granting #9 Motion for service of documents ; directing the clerk to provide the plf with a copy of the defs motion for leave to file a motion to dismiss (Doc. #7 ) and the exhibit attached to such motion indicating that he has been reinstated to parole eligibility with parole consideration tentatively set for December of 2018; GRANTING plf an extension until 11/14/2018 to (i) show cause why the defs' motion for leave to file a motion to dismiss should not be granted, and (ii) address the defs' argument that this case is due to be dismissed as motion since he is now restored to the docket for parole consideration, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/2/18. (djy, ) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE TO #8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by James Griffin. (kh, ) |
MOTION for service of documents by James Griffin.(NO PDF document attached to this notice-See Docket entry #9 ). (djy, ) |
Filing 8 ORDERED that on or before November 7, 2018 the plaintiff shall: 1. Show cause why the #7 motion for leave to file a motion to dismiss should not be granted. 2. Address the defendants' argument in support of the proposed motion to dismiss that this case is due to be dismissed as moot since he received the requested relief and is now scheduled for parole consideration in December of 2018, as further set out. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/24/2018. (kh, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to File Motion to Dismiss by Terry Davis, Lynn Head, Parole Board Review Committee, Clifford Walker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Blackburn, Kevin) |
Filing 6 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Terry Davis, Lynn Head, Parole Board Review Committee, Clifford Walker. (Blackburn, Kevin) |
AO FORM 85 mailed to counsel for Terry Davis, Lynn Head, Parole Board Review Committee, Clifford Walker (no pdf document attached to this entry)(kh, ) |
Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint and #4 Order signed by (not signed) for Terry Davis, Lynn Head, Parole Board Review Committee, Clifford Walker served on (not dated). (kh, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER on or before October 23, 2018; copies mailed to plaintiff; mailed by CMRRR with complaint to named defendants and General Counsel for the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/13/2018. (kh, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Staton Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/13/2018. (furn: account clerk & cashier)(kh, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by James Griffin. (kr, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Terry Davis, Lynn Head, Parole Board Review Committee, Clifford Walker, filed by James Griffin.(kr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.