Ware v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: Carlos Renaldo Ware and Carlos Ware
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2018cv00814
Filed: September 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Charles S Coody
Referring Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDERED that on or before November 26, 2018, the petitioner may file a reply to the government's response, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/6/2018. (kh, )
November 1, 2018 Filing 7 REPLY BRIEF (RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION) re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by United States of America. (Ivy, Curtis) Modified on 11/2/2018 to clarify the docket text (wcl, ).
October 22, 2018 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT re #2 Order,, by Stephen P. Ganter. (Ganter, Stephen) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/22/2018: #1 Certificate of Service) (wcl, ).
October 22, 2018 Filing 5 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by United States of America. (Ivy, Curtis)
October 2, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Correction re #3 Affidavit, to attach a corrected PDF document to include the e-signature of the e-filing attorney, which was previously omitted in error. (Attachments: #1 Main PDF to Document #3 )(alm, )
October 1, 2018 Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT by Patricia Vanessa Kemp. (Kemp, Patricia) (Main Document 3 replaced on 10/2/2018 to attach a corrected PDF document to include the e-signature of the e-filing attorney, which was previously omitted in error.) (alm, ). Modified on 10/2/2018 (alm, ).
September 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER directing the U.S. Attorney to file a response to Ware's 2255 #1 Motion on or before 11/1/2018, as further set out in order; DIRECTING the Clerk to serve a copy of the 2255 #1 Motion to attorney Stephen P. Ganter and Patricia V. Kemp; ORDERED that on or before 10/22/2018, Mr. Ganter and Ms. Kemp shall file with this court affidavits that address all claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/28/2018. (alm, )
September 20, 2018 Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Carlos Ware. (Attachments: #1 Criminal Docket Sheet, #2 Criminal Judgment) (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ware v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Renaldo Ware
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Ware
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Curtis Ivy, Jr.
Represented By: Kevin P Davidson
Represented By: Robert Randolph Neeley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?