United States of America v. $10,435.00 in United States Currency
| United States of America |
| $10,435.00 in United States Currency |
| 2:2018cv00830 |
| September 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Wallace Capel |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #6 Warrant Issued to Brenda Arely Salgado-Duhon served on 10/15/2018. Acknowledgement filed by United States of America. (djy, ) |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #6 Warrant Issued on Richard A. Rice, Jr. on 10/15/2018. Acknowledgement filed by United States of America. (djy, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by United States of America (Declaration of Publication) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Forfeiture and Advertisement Certification Report)(Neeley, Robert) |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #6 Warrant Issued on def currency, served on 10/3/2018. Acknowledgement filed by United States of America. (djy, ) |
| Filing 6 WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM issued and furnished to the USMS for service. (kh, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of DOCKETING ERROR re #3 Complaint, which has been stricken from the recordas an erroneous docket entry. This complaint should have been entered in 3:18-cv-836-GMB. (kh, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for United States of America (kh, ) |
| Filing 3 (STRICKEN AS ERRONEOUS DOCKET ENTRY DUE TO CLERICAL ERROR) COMPLAINT against $10,435.00 in United States Currency, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture Against Personal Property, #2 Proposed Warrant of Arrest in Rem, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(kh, )Modified on 9/28/2018 (kh, ). Modified on 9/28/2018 (kh, ). (Main Document 3 replaced on 9/28/2018) (kh, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/28/2018) (kh, ). (Attachment 2 replaced on 9/28/2018) (kh, ). (Attachment 3 replaced on 9/28/2018) (kh, ). |
| Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by United States of America. (kh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against $10,435.00 in United States Currency, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture Against Personal Property, #2 Proposed Warrant of Arrest in Rem, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(kh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. $10,435.00 in United States Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: $10,435.00 in United States Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Robert Randolph Neeley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
