McMillan v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
| Calvin McMillian and Calvin McMillan |
| Jefferson S. Dunn and Cynthia Stewart |
| 2:2018cv00844 |
| September 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Charles S Coody |
| Myron H Thompson |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: Respondents shall file any response they wish to make to Petitioner's #3 MOTION to Hold Case in Abeyance Pending Completion of State Post-Conviction Proceedings within fourteen days; copies mailed to respondents' counsel as directed. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/14/2018. (wcl, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Hold Case in Abeyance Pending Completion of State Post-Conviction Proceedings by Calvin McMillan. (Moss, Katherine) Modified on 10/16/2018 to clarify the docket text (wcl, ). |
| Filing 2 Case Reassigned to Chief Judge William Keith Watkins as Presiding Judge; Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson no longer assigned to the case. (alm, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody Under a Death Sentence (Filing fee $ 5.00, receipt number 4602050849.), filed by Calvin McMillan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(alm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
