Copeland v. Corizon LLC
| Michele Copeland |
| Corizon LLC |
| 2:2018cv00976 |
| November 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| Emily C Marks |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Corizon LLC Corporate Disclosures due by 1/25/2019. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Attachment)(kh, ) |
| Filing 10 Case Reassigned to Honorable Judge Emily C. Marks; Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden no longer assigned to the case as presidig judge. (kh, ) |
| Filing 9 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Michele Copeland. (kh, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/13/2018: #1 Corrected Certificate of Service) (kh, ). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Tanika Larosa Lakes Finney on behalf of Michele Copeland (Finney, Tanika) |
Filing 7
ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable, but no later than January 7, 2019, as further set out in order. Accordingly, counsel for the parties are DIRECTED to complete and to send to the Clerk of Court the appropriate attached form so that the form is received by the Clerk of Court on or before January 7, 2019. CONSENT FORMS MAY NOW BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 12/13/2018. (kh, )
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Corizon LLC (kh, ) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Corizon LLC.(Piggott, Philip) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Michele Copeland (kh, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michele Copeland. Corizon LLC served on 11/21/2018, answer due 12/12/2018. (kh, ) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Corizon LLC. and returned to counsel for personal service. (kh, ) . |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Corizon LLC ( Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602051479.), filed by Michele Copeland. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Filing Fee Receipt)(kh, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Michele Copeland. (no pdf document attached to this entry - see docket entry #1 for pdf)(kh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Copeland v. Corizon LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Corizon LLC | |
| Represented By: | Philip Piggott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michele Copeland | |
| Represented By: | Kyle David Sawyer |
| Represented By: | Julian Lenwood McPhillips, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Tanika Larosa Lakes Finney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
