Tillery v. Covington County et al (INMATE 2)
| Joseph Evan Tillery |
| Alan Sylar, Dennis Meeks, Covington County and Jeffrey Scott Racz |
| 2:2018cv00989 |
| November 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| W Harold Albritton |
| Charles S Coody |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plf's failures to comply with the order of the court and to prosecute this action; Objections to R&R due by 2/7/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 1/24/2019. (alm, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) On or before 12/14/2018, Plf shall submit an inmate account statement, as further set out in order; 2) The Clerk of Court SEND a copy of this order to the inmate account clerk at the Alabama Therapeutic Education Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/30/2018. (Copy mailed to account clerk as directed) (alm, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Joseph Evan Tillery. (beh, ) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Covington County, Dennis Meeks, Jeffrey Scott Racz, Alan Sylar, filed by Joseph Evan Tillery.(beh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
