Mauldin v. Exxact Transport, Inc.
| Morning Mauldin |
| Exxact Transport, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv01021 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Myron H Thompson |
| Susan Russ Walker |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Accordingly, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the joint motion to remand (doc. no. #6 ) is granted and that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c), this cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama. It is further ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) order (doc. no. #3 ) is vacated. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to take appropriate steps to effect the remand. This case is closed in this court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/21/2018. (kh, )
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Remand by Exxact Transport, Inc. and Morning Mauldin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Ross, Brett) Modified on 12/21/2018 to reflected filed on behalf of the plaintiff. (kh, ). |
| Filing 5 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Exxact Transport, Inc. Corporate Disclosures due by 12/28/2018. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Attachment)(kh, ) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Morning Mauldin Corporate Disclosures due by 12/28/2018. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Attachment)(kh, ) |
|
Filing 3
(VACATED PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S #7 ORDER) RULE 26(f) ORDER: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not later than January 2, 2019, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/11/2018. (kh, ) Modified on 12/21/2018 (kh, ).
|
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Exxact Transport, Inc..(kh, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Exxact Transport, Inc. from Circuit Court of Montgomery County, AL, case number 03-CV-2018-902040.00. ( Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602051614) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Filing Fee Receipt)(kh, ) |
| COMPLAINT against Exxact Transport, Inc., filed by Morning Mauldin.(no pdf document attached to this entry - see docket entry #1 for pdf)(kh, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Morning Mauldin. (no pdf document attached to this entry - see docket entry #1 for pdf)(kh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mauldin v. Exxact Transport, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Exxact Transport, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brett A. Ross |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Larsen Pratt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Morning Mauldin | |
| Represented By: | Randle Al Myers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
