Jupiter v. Hobbs et al (INMATE 1)
Keon Conelius Jupiter |
Barly Bailey, Herbert Hobbs, Daryl Bailey and Truman M. Hobbs, Jr. |
2:2018cv01037 |
December 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Gray M Borden |
Mandamus & Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: it is ORDERED that Daryl Bailey be substituted as a dft for Barly Bailey. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 12/14/2018. (wcl, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER: it is ORDERED that Truman M. Hobbs be substituted as a dft for Herbert Hobbs, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 12/14/2018. (wcl, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Easterling Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden on 12/14/2018. (furn: cashier) (wcl, ) Modified on 12/14/2018 to correct a typographical clerical error in the Judge's signature date to reflect as 2018 and not 2019 (wcl, ). |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Keon Conelius Jupiter. (es, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Barly Bailey, Herbert Hobbs, filed by Keon Conelius Jupiter.(es, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.