In Re: Petit Jury Fees Supplemental Attendance Fee
In Re: In Re: Petit Jury Fees Supplemental Attendance Fee
Case Number: 2:2018mc03839
Filed: October 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 STANDING ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that unless the trial judge orders that the supplemental fee not be paid, petit jurors hearing one case will receive the supplemental fee, not exceeding $10 more than the attendance fee, for each day of service in excess of ten days required to hear the case. If the attendance fee or the supplemental attendance fee is increased in the future, IT IS ORDERED that petit jurors serving more than 10 days in one case receive the increased amount without issuing a new standing order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/29/2018. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Petit Jury Fees Supplemental Attendance Fee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re: In Re: Petit Jury Fees Supplemental Attendance Fee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?