State of Alabama v. Johns (INMATE 2)
State of Alabama |
Charles Kelvin Johns |
2:2019cv00118 |
February 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Charles S Coody |
Myron H Thompson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that: 1) The magistrate judge's #3 recommendation is adopted; 2) Pursuant to 28 USC 1455(b)(4), this cause is remanded to the Circuit Court of Pike County, AL; DIRECTING the Clerk to take appropriate steps to effect the remand; This case is closed in this court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/5/2019. (Certified Copies of Opinion and Order & Docket Sheet mailed to Pike County Circuit Court) (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(alm, ) |
Filing 16 ORDER: It is ORDERED that: 1) Dft's #13 & #14 objections are overruled; 2) Dft's #13 & #14 motions for relief pursuant to FRCP 60 are denied; 3) Dft's #12 motion for class certification and motion to deposit into court are denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/5/2019. (alm, ) |
Filing 15 OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that the #4 motion for preliminary injunction is denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/5/2019. (alm, ) |
No objections filed to the #3 Recommendation. (No pdf attached to this entry) (alm, ) |
Filing 14 Objection to #11 Order and MOTION for Rule 60(a) Relief filed by Charles Kelvin Johns. (alm, ) |
Filing 13 Objection to #10 Order and MOTION for Rule 60(b)(4) Relief filed by Charles Kelvin Johns. (Attachments: #1 "Attachment 1", #2 "Attachment 2")(alm, ) |
MOTION for Rule 60(a) Relief by Charles Kelvin Johns. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #14 for pdf) (alm, ) |
MOTION for Rule 60(b)(4) Relief by Charles Kelvin Johns. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #13 for pdf) (alm, ) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Class Certification and MOTION to Deposit Into Court by Charles Kelvin Johns. (alm, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER denying #9 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/12/2019. (alm, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER denying #8 MOTION to Stay; To the extent Johns' request to stay is considered a motion for extension of time to file objections, it is ORDERED that: 1) The #8 motion for extension of time is GRANTED; 2) Dft is GRANTED an extension from 3/14/2019, to and including 3/28/2019, to file his objection to the #3 Recommendation. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 3/12/2019. (alm, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Joinder Required Party by Charles Kelvin Johns. (alm, ) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Filing of Objections Pending Injunction/TRO for Retention of Counsel & Provision of Exhibit [B] by Charles Kelvin Johns. (alm, ). Added MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections on 3/12/2019, as CONSIDERED in the Court's #10 Order. (alm, ). |
Filing 7 ORDER denying #4 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; The #4 motion for preliminary injunction remains pending. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/4/2019. (alm, ) |
Filing 6 Case reassigned to Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson. Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins no longer assigned to the case as presiding judge. (dmn, ) |
Filing 5 Case reassigned to Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins. Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III no longer assigned to the case as presiding judge. (dmn, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order to Allow Retention of Counsel of Choice, MOTION for Injunction by Charles Kelvin Johns. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Affidavit in Support)(dmn, ) |
Filing 3 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that this case be REMANDED to the Circuit Court for Pike County, Alabama. Objections to R&R due by 3/14/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 2/28/2019. (dmn, ) |
Filing 2 AMENDMENT with Affidavit in Support of Preliminary Injunction/TRO to #1 Notice of Removal by Charles Kelvin Johns.(dmn, ) |
Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Charles Kelvin Johns, filed by State of Alabama.(dmn, ) (NO PDF, see Doc. #1 .) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Charles Kelvin Johns from Circuit Court of Pike County, Alabama, case number 55-cc-16-00278.00, 55-cc-16-00279.00. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, Affidavit, #2 Appendix B, State Court Record on Appeal (cover page only, no record received), #3 Appendix C, Letter to Attorney Joseph Fellows, #4 Appendix D, Letter to State Court)(dmn, ) (NO $/NO IFP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: State of Alabama v. Johns (INMATE 2) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Charles Kelvin Johns | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: State of Alabama | |
Represented By: | Thomas Treutlen Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.