Thomas v. CACH, LLC et al (MAG +)
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Thomas
Defendant: CACH, LLC and Resurgent Capital Services, LP
Case Number: 2:2019cv00360
Filed: May 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Referring Judge: William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address (phone number) by Christopher D. Thomas. (cnw, )
July 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RULE 26(f) ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable, as further set out in order; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/1/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Wallace Capel, Jr on 7/11/2019. (cnw, )
May 30, 2019 Filing 7 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Resurgent Capital Services, LP. (Moore, Neal) Modified on 5/30/2019 to reflect as satisfying #2 deficiency notice(cnw, ).
May 30, 2019 Filing 6 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by Resurgent Capital Services, LP.(Moore, Neal)
May 30, 2019 Filing 5 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by CACH, LLC. (Moore, Neal) Modified on 5/30/2019 to clarify as satisfying #2 deficiency notice(cnw, ).
May 30, 2019 Filing 4 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint by CACH, LLC.(Moore, Neal)
May 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: It is ORDERED that, under 28 USC 636, this case is referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for consideration and disposition or recommendation on all pretrial matters as may be appropriate. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/24/2019. (cnw, )
May 22, 2019 Filing 2 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to CACH, LLC and Resurgent Capital Services, LP; Corporate Disclosures due by 6/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Conflict Disclosure Statement)(cnw, )
May 21, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Resurgent Capital Services, LP, Christopher D. Thomas from Circuit Court of Montgomery County, case number 03-cv-19-000191. ( Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602053622) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 receipt)(cnw, )
May 21, 2019 COMPLAINT against CACH, LLC, Resurgent Capital Services, LP, filed by Christopher D. Thomas. (No pdf attached to this entry - see doc #1 for pdf)(cnw, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. CACH, LLC et al (MAG +)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CACH, LLC
Represented By: Neal DeWitt Moore, III
Represented By: Tina Lam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Resurgent Capital Services, LP
Represented By: Neal DeWitt Moore, III
Represented By: Tina Lam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?