Giles v. Simpson et al (INMATE 1)
Joe Nathan Giles |
Joy Simpson, John H. Merrill, Yvonne Trafford, Kelly Butler and Young Boozer |
2:2019cv00439 |
June 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Gray M Borden |
Charles S Coody |
Myron H Thompson |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 OPINION. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/15/2019. (dmn, ) |
Filing 4 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by Joe Nathan Giles. (kh, ) |
Filing 3 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that: 1. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joe Nathan Giles (Doc. #2 ) be DENIED. 2. This case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Giles' failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Objections to R&R due by 7/10/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/26/2019. (kh, ) |
Case Reassigned to Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody; Honorable Judge Gray M. Borden no longer assigned to the case as referral judge. (kh, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Joe Nathan Giles. (es, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Young Boozer, Kelly Butler, John H. Merrill, Joy Simpson, Yvonne Trafford, filed by Joe Nathan Giles. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(es, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.