Vidich v. Meeks et al
| Andrew Vidich |
| Scott Ractz, Dennis Meeks, David Anderson, Alan Syler, Todd Grimes and Blake Thurman |
| 2:2019cv00446 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
GENERAL BRIEFING ORDER setting out other briefing requirements, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/21/2019. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 19
UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER: On-the-record Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/3/2020, in Montgomery, AL, before Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins; Jury Trial set for 11/2/2020, in Montgomery, AL, before Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins; Dispositive and Daubert Motions due by 3/9/2020; Mediation Notice due by 2/15/2020; Amended Pleadings due by 10/29/2019; Discovery due by 2/10/2020, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/20/2019. (furn: calendar, wr) (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER construing the request for entry of the Court's standard HIPAA protective order (Doc #17 , at 4) as a motion; ORDER denying with leave to refile #17 Motion for Entry of the Court's Standard Protective Order, contained within the Rule 26(f) report. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/19/2019. (wcl, )
|
| MOTION for Entry of the Court's Standard HIPAA Protective Order by David Anderson, Todd Grimes, Dennis Meeks, Scott Ractz, Alan Syler, Blake Thurman, as construed in the court's #18 Order. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #17 for pdf) (wcl, ) |
| Filing 17 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Hill, Charles) |
| ***PURSUANT TO THE #17 RULE 26(F) REPORT - Attorney Blake Edward Brookshire for David Anderson, Todd Grimes, Dennis Meeks, Scott Ractz, Alan Syler, Blake Thurman added. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, ) |
| Filing 16 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Todd Grimes re #9 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement,. (Hill, Charles) |
| Filing 15 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Scott Ractz re #9 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement,. (Hill, Charles) |
| Filing 14 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Dennis Meeks re #9 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement,. (Hill, Charles) |
| Filing 13 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by David Anderson re #9 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement,. (Hill, Charles) |
| Filing 12 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Blake Thurman re #9 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement,. (Hill, Charles) |
| Filing 11 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Alan Syler re #9 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement,. (Hill, Charles) |
|
Filing 10
RULE 26(f) ORDER: ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not later than August 14, 2019, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/23/2019. (kh, )
|
| Filing 9 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Dennis Meeks, David Anderson, Alan Syler, Blake Thurman, Scott Ractz, Todd Grimes; Corporate Disclosures due by 8/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(wcl, ) |
| Filing 8 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to David Anderson with the following notation, "Return To Sender, Attempted - Not Known, Unable To Forward"; counsel is notified via this notice regarding unperfected service. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by David Anderson, Todd Grimes, Dennis Meeks, Scott Ractz, Alan Syler, Blake Thurman.(Hill, Charles) |
| ***PURSUANT TO THE #7 ANSWER - Attorney Ashley Hawkins Freeman for David Anderson, Todd Grimes, Dennis Meeks, Scott Ractz, Alan Syler, and Blake Thurman added. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, ) |
| Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of summons and complaint signed by Laura Hudson for Alan Syler served on 7/1/2019, answer due 7/22/2019. (dmn, ) |
| Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons and Complaint signed by Laura Hudson for: David Anderson served on 7/1/2019, answer due 7/22/2019; Todd Grimes served on 7/1/2019, answer due 7/22/2019; Scott Ractz served on 7/1/2019, answer due 7/22/2019; Blake Thurman served on 7/1/2019, answer due 7/22/2019. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 4 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons and Complaint signed by Altheia Meeks for Dennis Meeks served on 7/2/2019, answer due 7/23/2019. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to David Anderson, Todd Grimes, Dennis Meeks, Scott Ractz, Alan Syler, Blake Thurman; mailed CMRRR with copy of #1 Complaint. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Andrew Vidich. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Anderson, Todd Grimes, Dennis Meeks, Scott Ractz, Alan Syler, Blake Thurman (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602054004.), filed by Andrew Vidich. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt) (wcl, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Andrew Vidich. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #1 for pdf) (wcl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
