Moore v. Streeter et al (INMATE 2)
Charles Eugene Moore |
William Streeter and Joey Craig |
2:2019cv00586 |
August 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Stephen Michael Doyle |
Myron H Thompson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 7 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations by Charles Eugene Moore. (kh, ) |
Filing 6 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that: 1) The #1 Motion for Preliminary Injunction be DENIED; and 2) This case be referred to the undersigned for additional proceedings; Objections to R&R due by 9/18/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 9/4/2019. (wcl, ) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Charles Eugene Moore. (wcl, ) |
|
|
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Charles Eugene Moore. (bes, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Joey Craig, William Streeter, filed by Charles Eugene Moore.(bes, ) |
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Charles Eugene Moore. (No PDF Attached - See Docket Entry #1 ) (bes, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Charles Eugene Moore. (No PDF Attached - See Docket Entry #1 ) (bes, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.