Helmuth v. Troy University

Helmuth v. Troy University

Plaintiff:	Catherine Helmuth
Defendant:	Troy University
Case Number:	2:2019cv00601
Filed:	August 21, 2019
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge:	Stephen Michael Doyle
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 19, 2021	Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) To the extent Troy University seeks summary judgment on Helmuth's disability discrimination claims for failure to hire and failure to accommodate in Count I (ADA and Section 504), the 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 2) To the extent Troy University seeks summary judgment on Helmuth's claims for failure to provide non-discriminatory terms of employment, such as salary, in Count I (ADA and Section 504), the 21 Mo tion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 3) The 21 Motion for Summary Judgment, as to Count II (Improper Medical Inquiry) is DENIED; 4) To the extent Troy University seeks summary judgment on Helmuth's disability discrimination claims for failure to hire in Count III (Title VII), the 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 5) To the extent Troy University seeks summary judgment on Helmuth's claims for failure to provide non-discriminatory terms of employment, such as salary, in Count III, the 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 3/19/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(amf, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 19, 2021

Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) To the extent Troy University seeks summary judgment on Helmuth's disability discrimination claims for failure to hire and failure to accommodate in Count I (ADA and Section 504), the 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 2) To the extent Troy University seeks summary judgment on Helmuth's claims for failure to provide non-discriminatory terms of employment, such as salary, in Count I (ADA and Section 504), the 21 Mo tion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 3) The 21 Motion for Summary Judgment, as to Count II (Improper Medical Inquiry) is DENIED; 4) To the extent Troy University seeks summary judgment on Helmuth's disability discrimination claims for failure to hire in Count III (Title VII), the 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; 5) To the extent Troy University seeks summary judgment on Helmuth's claims for failure to provide non-discriminatory terms of employment, such as salary, in Count III, the 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 3/19/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(amf, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Helmuth v. Troy University
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Troy University
Represented By:	Nicholas Joseph Cervera
Represented By:	Matthew Michael Baker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catherine Helmuth
Represented By:	Rachel Lee McGinley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?