Moore v. Jamison et al (INMATE 1)
| Charles Eugene Moore |
| Joey Craig and Leroy Jamison |
| 2:2019cv00612 |
| August 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Charles S Coody |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: it is ORDERED that on or before 10/28/2019, General Counsel for the ALDOC shall contact appropriate officials at Kilby to determine if any video recording of the alleged incident is available and, if such recording is available, ensure that the recording is preserved for submission to this court; further ORDERED that on or before 11/4/2019, General Counsel for the ALDOC shall file a notice with this court advising of the results of the inquiry addressed in this order; DIRECTING the Clerk to provide a copy of this order via certified mail to the General Counsel for the ALDOC. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/16/2019. (Copy mailed CMRRR as directed) (amf, )
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: it is ORDERED that the plf be GRANTED an extension from 10/24/2019 to and including 11/15/2019 to pay the $11.17 initial partial filing fee, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/16/2019. (Furnished: Cashier) (amf, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER withdrawing the #5 Recommendation; It is ORDERED that the plf be GRANTED an extension to and including 10/24/2019 to pay the initial partial filing fee, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 10/3/2019. (amf, )
|
| Filing 6 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendation by Charles Eugene Moore. (amf, ) |
|
Filing 5
(WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S #7 ORDER) RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure of the plf to pay the initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 USC 1915(b)(1)(A) as ordered by this court; Objections to R&R due by 10/10/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/26/2019. (amf, ) Modified on 10/3/2019 (amf, ).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $11.17 be paid on or before 9/16/2019; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Kilby CF. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/26/2019. (Furnished: Cashier) (alm, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #1 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; further ORDERED that the above-styled action is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 USC 636 for further proceedings and determination or recommendation as may be appropriate. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/23/2019. (alm, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Charles Eugene Moore. (bes, ) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Joey Craig, Leroy Jamison, filed by Charles Eugene Moore.(bes, ) |
| MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Charles Eugene Moore. (No PDF Attached - See Docket Entry #1 ) (bes, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Charles Eugene Moore. (No PDF Attached - See Docket Entry #1 ) (bes, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
