Bradley v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Roosevelt Lamar Bradley |
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. |
2:2019cv00662 |
September 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Susan Russ Walker |
William Keith Watkins |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12181 Americans |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 TEXT ORDER granting #14 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Michael J. Chilleen. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/7/2019. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, ) |
Filing 17 UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER: on-the-record Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/3/2020, in Montgomery, AL, before Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins; Jury Trial set for 11/2/2020, in Montgomery, AL, before Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins; Dispositive and Daubert Motions due by 5/6/2020; Mediation Notice due by 4/11/2020; Amended Pleadings by the plf due by 12/13/2019, and by the dft due by 1/13/2020; Discovery due by 4/6/2020, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/5/2019. (furn: calendar, wr) (wcl, ) |
Filing 16 BRIEFING ORDER that the #11 MOTION to Strike Dft's Affirmative Defenses to Plf's Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial be submitted without oral argument on 12/2/2019; further ORDERED that Dft file a response, which shall include a brief, on or before 11/25/2019; Plf may file a reply brief on or before 12/2/2019, as further set out in order; ORDER setting out other briefing requirements, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/4/2019. (wcl, ) |
Filing 15 Pro Hac Vice Filing fee received re #14 motion: $ 75.00, receipt number 4602055526. (wcl, ) |
***PURSUANT TO THE #14 MOTION - Attorney Michael J. Chilleen for Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. added. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, ) |
Filing 14 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Michael J. Chilleen by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Beck, James) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/4/2019: #2 Corrected Signature Page) (amf, ). Modified on 11/4/2019 to attach a corrected signature page to reflect the correct e-filing attorney's e-signature (amf, ). |
Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Beck, James) |
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Taylor, Cassie) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Strike #6 Answer to Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial by Roosevelt Lamar Bradley. (Taylor, Cassie) |
Filing 10 Case Reassigned to Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins as presiding judge and Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker as referral judge; Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker no longer assigned to the case as presiding judge. (wcl, ) |
Filing 9 RULE 26(f) ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable, as further set out in order; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/30/2019; counsel for the parties are DIRECTED to complete the appropriate attached form so that the form is received by the Clerk on or before 10/18/2019; Do NOT electronically file the consent form nor reassignment form into the record. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 10/10/2019. (wcl, ) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (amf, ) |
***PURSUANT TO THE #6 ANSWER - Attorney James Edwin Beck, III for Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. added. (No PDF attached to this entry) (amf, ) |
Filing 7 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Henderson, David) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc..(Henderson, David) |
Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons and Complaint signed by Kelly Webster for Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. served on 9/16/2019, answer due 10/7/2019. (wcl, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Roosevelt Lamar Bradley. (wcl, ) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.; mailed CMRRR with copy of #1 Complaint. (wcl, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Roosevelt Lamar Bradley. (wcl, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602054882.), filed by Roosevelt Lamar Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt) (wcl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bradley v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Lamar Bradley | |
Represented By: | Lowell Landis Sexton |
Represented By: | Cassie E. Taylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. | |
Represented By: | David Wayne Henderson |
Represented By: | Michael J. Chilleen |
Represented By: | James Edwin Beck, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.