Cobble v. United States of America(INMATE 2)
| Daniel Eric Cobble |
| United States of America |
| 2:2019cv00705 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Emily C Marks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER OVERRULING petitioner's #9 Objection and the Order and Final Judgment entered 11/12/2019, remain in full force and effect; this case is CLOSED. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 11/15/19. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER ON MOTIONS denying #8 Miscellaneous Motions in which petitioner seeks various actions by the court. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 11/13/19. (djy, )
|
|
Filing 7
FINAL JUDGMENT, in accordance with the order entered on this date adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court that judgment is entered in favor of the Respondent and against the Petitioner, and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice; directing the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 11/12/19. (Attachments: #1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER directing as follows: (1) the petitioner's #5 Objections are overruled; (2) the #4 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; and (3) this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; a separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 11/12/19. (djy, )
|
| Filing 9 Objection filed by Daniel Eric Cobble. (djy, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTIONS for miscellaneous court action by Daniel Eric Cobble. (djy, ) |
| Filing 5 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Daniel Eric Cobble. (djy, ) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 10/30/19. (djy, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 10/25/19. (djy, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Daniel Eric Cobble. (es, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Daniel Eric Cobble.(es, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cobble v. United States of America(INMATE 2) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Eric Cobble | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
