Cobble v. U.S. Government et al (INMATE 1)
Daniel Eric Cobble |
U.S. Government, Karen Darlene Castleberry, Stephanie Anne Biggers, Paul Curtis Lockhart and Georgia District Court |
2:2019cv00888 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
W Harold Albritton |
Charles S Coody |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER ON MOTIONS: Before the court is Petitioner's notice of appeal (Doc. #8 ), which the court construes to contain a Motion for Certificate of Appealability and Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. It is ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED; and that the appeal in this cause is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 1915(a), as not taken in good faith. It is further ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 1/7/2020. Furnished Appeals Clerk. (dmn, ) |
Filing 9 Transmission of #8 Notice of Appeal, #7 Final Judgment, #6 Order, and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet and Appeal Record)(dmn, ) |
Filing 10 USCA Case Number 20-10034-J for #8 Notice of Appeal, filed by Daniel Eric Cobble. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. (dmn, ) |
MOTION for Certificate of Appealability, MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Daniel Eric Cobble. (dmn, ) (no pdf, see Doc. #8 for pdf) |
Filing 8 PRO SE NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and #7 Judgment, by Daniel Eric Cobble (forwarded by 11th Circuit and received on 12/27/2019 by MD AL). (djy, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/3/2020: #1 USCA Cover letter) (djy, ). |
Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT: Judgment is entered in favor of the respondents and against the petitioner and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; DIRECTING the Clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a Final Judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/2/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(amf, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) The #5 Objection to the Recommendation is OVERRULED; 2) The #4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 3) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; A separate Final Judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 12/2/2019. (amf, ) |
Filing 5 OBJECTION to #4 Report and Recommendations by Daniel Eric Cobble. (amf, ) |
Filing 4 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; Objections to R&R due by 12/3/2019. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/19/2019. (kr, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER ON MOTION: Upon review of the application for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees filed by Petitioner (Doc. #2 ), which the court construes as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the instant habeas action, it ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 11/19/2019. (kr, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Daniel Eric Cobble. (amf, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Daniel Eric Cobble. (amf, ) Modified on 11/18/2019 to remove "no ifp; no filing fee" text (amf, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.