United States of America v. Clayton et al
United States of America |
Laquanta Clayton |
Convergent Outsourcing |
2:2019mc03882 |
July 30, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Stephen Michael Doyle |
Myron H Thompson |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #1 Application for Writ of Garnishment, #2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement, and #3 Writ of Garnishment, served on LaQuanta Claton on 8/30/2019. (wcl, ) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed as to #1 Application for Writ of Garnishment, #2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement, and #3 Writ of Garnishment, served on Zameka Floyd (HR Generalist) for Convergent Outsourcing on 8/7/2019. (wcl, ) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Writ of Garnishment by Convergent Outsourcing. (wcl, ) |
Filing 3 WRIT OF GARNISHMENT issued and furnished to US Marshal for service. (wcl, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by United States of America. (wcl, ) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Instructions to Garnishee, #2 Notice of Garnishment and Instructions to Debtor, #3 Right to Claim Exemption, #4 Proposed Writ of Garnishment, #5 Garnishee Answer Form)(wcl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.