Logan v. Windcreek Montgomery Casino (MAG+)
Channa Logan |
Windcreek Montgomery Casino |
2:2020cv00016 |
January 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Susan Russ Walker |
William Keith Watkins |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; further ORDERED that the Clerk is DIRECTED to defer service of process on the dft until further order of the court, following the court's 1915(e) review of the plf's complaint, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 01/30/2020. (bes, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE pursuant to 28 USC 636 to Magistrate Judge Honorable Susan Russ Walker for further proceedings and determination or recommendation as may be appropriate. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/16/2020. (wcl, ) |
Filing 7 Case transferred in from Southern District of Alabama; Case Number 1:19-cv-01069-JB-M. Original file with certified copies of transfer order and docket sheet received ELECTRONICALLY via EMAIL from ALND Clerk.(kh, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER (entered in SDAL), amending #4 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. The previous order incorrectly transferred this matter to the USDC for the Northern District of Alabama. The proper venue is the Middle District of Alabama. The order is modified and this matter is transferred to the Middle District. Signed by District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstock on 1/8/20.(kh, ) |
Filing 5 ***Case Transfer Confirmation (entered in SDAL). Case received and opened in Northern District of Alabama, Case Number 4:20-cv-00020. (kh, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (entered in SDAL) re #1 Complaint filed by Channa Logan. This action is transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Signed by District Judge Jeffrey U. Beaverstockon 1/6/20. (copy to plaintiff) (kh, ) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (entered in SDAL) re #1 Complaint filed by Channa Logan that this action be transferred to the U.S.District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. Objections to R&R due 14 days from the date of service of this document.Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 12/16/19.(copy mailed to plaintiff) (kh, ) Modified on 1/14/2020 (kh, ). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Channa Logan. (kh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Windcreek Montgomery Casino, filed by Channa Logan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kh, ) Modified on 1/14/2020 to remove the filing fee amount. (kh, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Logan v. Windcreek Montgomery Casino (MAG+) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Windcreek Montgomery Casino | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Channa Logan | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.