Martinez v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
| Michael Martinez |
| Alabama Department of Corrections and Wexford Health Sources, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv00239 |
| April 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Charles S Coody |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failures to comply with the order of the court and to prosecute this action. Objections to R&R due by 6/10/2020. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/27/2020. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: it is ORDERED that: 1) On or before 4/30/2020, Plf shall submit an inmate account statement, as further set out in order; 2) DIRECTING the clerk to SEND a copy of this order to the inmate account clerk at the Easterling CF. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 4/16/2020. (Copy mailed to Account Clerk as directed)(amf, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Michael Martinez. (hrs, ) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., filed by Michael Martinez.(hrs, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
