Dortch v. Parker (INMATE 1)
Harold L. Dortch |
S. Parker |
2:2020cv00321 |
May 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Charles S Coody |
William Keith Watkins |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDERED that in filing her answer and special report in compliance with the directives of the order entered on June 8, 2020 (Doc. #5 ) the defendant shall address the claims raised in the complaint and amendment thereto. The CLERK is hereby DIRECTED to furnish a copy of this order to the plaintiff,and General Counsel for the Alabama Department of Corrections and to serve a copy of this order together with a copy of the amendment to the complaint (Doc. #9 ) via certified mail to the defendant. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/18/2020. (kh, ) |
Filing 9 AMENDED Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against S. Parker, filed by Harold L. Dortch.(kh, ) |
Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint and #5 Order signed by O. Hicks for S. Parker served on 6/10/2020, answer due 7/20/2020. (kh, ) |
Filing 7 ORDERED that the #6 motion for appointment of counsel be and is hereby DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/9/2020. (kh, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION For Appointment of Counsel by Harold L. Dortch. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Harold L. Dortch)(kh, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT on or before 7/20/2020 as further set out in the order; copies mailed to plaintiff and General Counsel for the Alabama Department of Corrections; mailed by CMRRR with complaint to the defendant. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/8/2020. (dmn, ) |
Filing 4 INITIAL Filing fee received: $ 13.43, receipt number 4602058155 (dmn, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $13.43 be paid on or before 6/15/2020 ; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until $350 fee is paid in full; granting #2 motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk @ Bullock County Corr Fac. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 5/19/2020. Furnished to cashier. (djy, ) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Harold L Dortch. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Attachment)(imm, ) |
Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against S. Parker, filed by Harold L Dortch. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents)(imm, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/19/2020: #2 Inmate Request Slip) (kh, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dortch v. Parker (INMATE 1) | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Harold L. Dortch | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: S. Parker | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.