Allstate Property and Casualty Company v. Wilks
| Allstate Property and Casualty Company |
| Michael Wilks |
| 2:2020cv00496 |
| July 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Wallace Capel |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: it is ORDERED that Dft shall file a response by 9/11/2020, and show cause why the #7 Motion to Dismiss Count Two of the Counterclaim should not be granted; Plf may file a reply by 9/18/2020. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 8/28/2020. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 9
Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Michael Wilks; Corporate Disclosures due by 9/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement Attachment) (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Michael Wilks. (wcl, )
|
|
***PURSUANT TO THE #7 MOTION - Attorney Joseph Lamar Cowan, II for Allstate Property and Casualty Company added. (No pdf attached to this entry) (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss Count Two of the Counterclaim by Allstate Property and Casualty Company. (Hart, J.)
|
|
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Michael Wilks. (No pdf attached to this entry - See doc #6 for pdf) (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Allstate Property and Casualty Company by Michael Wilks.(Nicolau, Demosthenes)
|
|
Filing 5
Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint and #2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement signed by illegible for Michael Wilks served on 7/17/2020, answer due 8/7/2020. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Michael Wilks; mailed CMRRR with copy of #1 Complaint and #2 Conflict Statement. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Allstate Property and Casualty Company. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Allstate Property and Casualty Company. (wcl, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT against Michael Wilks (Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602058561.), filed by Allstate Property and Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt) (wcl, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allstate Property and Casualty Company v. Wilks | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael Wilks | |
| Represented By: | Demosthenes Athanasios Nicolau, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Allstate Property and Casualty Company | |
| Represented By: | J. Mark Hart |
| Represented By: | Robert Benjamin Reardon |
| Represented By: | Joseph Lamar Cowan, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
