Monroe v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
| Octavian Monroe and Octavian Monroe-El |
| United States of America |
| 2:2020cv00547 |
| July 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Jerusha T Adams |
| Emily C Marks |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissed without prejudice for Monroe's failure to pay the initial partial filing fee as ordered by this court; Objections to R&R due by 10/2/2020. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 9/17/2020. (cwl, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $9.50 be paid on or before 9/3/2020; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at Ventress Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Jerusha T. Adams on 8/19/2020. (furn: cashier) (cwl, )
|
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Octavian Monroe. (imm, ) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against United States of America, filed by Octavian Monroe.(imm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
