Rivers v. Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC
| Keith Rivers |
| Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC |
| 2:2020cv00559 |
| August 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| William Keith Watkins |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Case reassigned to Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins. Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle no longer assigned to the case as presiding judge. (dmn, ) |
| Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Harrison, Alicia) |
Filing 6
ORDER directing the parties to file the Rule 26(f) report containing the proposed discovery plan as further set out in the order. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/10/2020. Any party wishing to consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction shall complete the appropriate attached form so that the form is received by the Clerk on or before 9/10/2020 as further set out in the order. If a party elects to complete the form requesting reassignment to a district judge, counsel must complete the attached form and mail it to the Clerk's Office. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 8/13/2020. (dmn, )
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC.(Harrison, Alicia) |
| Filing 4 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC. (Harrison, Alicia) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Defendant Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC; Corporate Disclosures due by 8/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(amf, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for ALL PARTIES. (amf, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC from Circuit Court of Montgomery County, AL, case number 03-CV-2020-900844.00. (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 4602058888) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Filing Fee Receipt)(amf, ) |
| COMPLAINT against Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC, filed by Keith Rivers. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #1 - 1 for PDF)(amf, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury filed by Keith Rivers. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #1 - 1 for PDF) (amf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rivers v. Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Keith Rivers | |
| Represented By: | Adam Shea Gober |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Diversicare of Montgomery, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Reed Robertson Bates |
| Represented By: | Alicia Medders Harrison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
