Cliff v. Hines (INMATE 2)
| Steve T. Cliff |
| Lt. Hines |
| 2:2020cv00601 |
| August 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Charles S Coody |
| R Austin Huffaker |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the order of the Court entered on this day adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the Court that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 10/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #3 ) is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ) is DENIED. 3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing and administrative fees upon initiation of his case. A final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr on 10/13/2020. (kh, )
|
| No objections filed to the #3 Recommendation. (no pdf document attached to this entry) (kh, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. #4 ) is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension from September 3, 2020, to and including October 5, 2020, to file his objections. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 9/9/2020. (kh, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time by Steve T. Cliff. (kh, ) |
| Filing 3 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE that: 1. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Plaintiff (Doc. #2 ) be DENIED. 2. This case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing and administrative fees upon initiation of this case. Objections to R&R due by 9/3/2020. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 8/20/2020. (kh, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Steve T. Cliff. (Attachments: #1 IFP Declaration, #2 Affidavit)(imm, ) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Lt. Hines, filed by Steve T. Cliff. (Attachments: #1 Formal Complaint)(imm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cliff v. Hines (INMATE 2) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lt. Hines | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steve T. Cliff | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
