Cowan v. Ford Motor Company
Ranzi Cowan |
Ford Motor Company |
2:2020cv00760 |
September 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Susan Russ Walker |
Contract: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER: Upon consideration of the parties' #9 joint stipulation of dismissal, which comports with FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 12/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(amf, ) |
Filing 9 (STIPULATION of Dismissal) MOTION to Dismiss by Ford Motor Company, Ranzi Cowan. (Cannon, Jeffrey) Modified on 12/21/2020 to clarify the docket text & to add as also filed on behalf of the Plaintiff (amf, ). |
Filing 8 ORDER: It is ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint stipulation of dismissal or other appropriate filing on or before 12/30/2020. Signed by Honorable Judge Susan Russ Walker on 12/21/2020. (amf, ) |
STIPULATION of Dismissal by Ranzi Cowan, Ford Motor Company. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #9 for PDF) (amf, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by Ford Motor Company (Cannon, Jeffrey) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Removal Documents in State Court by Ford Motor Company re #1 Notice of Removal, (Cannon, Jeffrey) Modified on 9/25/2020 to clarify text (cwl, ). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Assignment to Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for (ALL PARTIES) Ranzi Cowan, Ford Motor Company. (cwl, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT "A" TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL PREVIOUSLY ADMITTED by Ford Motor Company re #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to #1 Notice of Removal)(cwl, ) |
Filing 3 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Ford Motor Company. (cwl, ) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Ford Motor Company.(cwl, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Ford Motor Company from Circuit Court of Montgomery County, case number 03-CV-20-901039. ( Filing fee $ 400.00 receipt number 4602059524) (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 receipt) (cwl, ) |
COMPLAINT against Ford Motor Company, filed by Ranzi Cowan. (No pdf attached to this entry - see doc #1 for pdf)(cwl, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ford Motor Company. (No pdf attached to this entry - see doc #2 for pdf) (cwl, ) |
NOTICE of Filing to State Court by Ford Motor Company re #1 Notice of Removal. (No pdf attached to this entry - see doc #1 for pdf) (cwl, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cowan v. Ford Motor Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Bartow Cannon, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ranzi Cowan | |
Represented By: | Katrina Washington Stewart |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.