Calloway v. Cintas Corporation No. 2
Jerlee Calloway |
Cintas Corporation No. 2 |
2:2020cv00778 |
September 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
R Austin Huffaker |
Kelly F Pate |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Case Reassigned to Honorable Judge R. Austin Huffaker, Jr as Presiding Judge & Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate as Referral Judge; Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate no longer assigned to the case as Presiding Judge. (amf, ) |
Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Porter, Adam) |
Filing 10 RULE 26(f) ORDER: it is ORDERED that the parties confer and submit a report based on the trial terms and scheduling order requirements of the Middle District of Alabama; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/13/2020, as further set out in order; DIRECTING counsel for the parties to complete the appropriate attached form and send it to the Clerk by 11/13/2020. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 10/23/2020. (amf, ) |
Filing 9 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Cintas Corporation No. 2 re #8 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement. (Barze, Ronald) |
Filing 8 Notice of Deficiency requiring filing of Corporate Disclosure/Conflict Statement sent to Defendant Cintas Corporation No. 2; Corporate Disclosures due by 11/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Attachment)(amf, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Defendant Cintas Corporation No. 2. (amf, ) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Cintas Corporation No. 2.(Barze, Ronald) |
Filing 5 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons & #1 Complaint, signed by Kelly Webster for Cintas Corporation No. 2, served on 10/1/2020, answer due 10/22/2020. (amf, ) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Cintas Corporation No. 2; mailed by CMRRR with copy of #1 Complaint. (amf, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Plaintiff Jerlee Calloway. (amf, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Jerlee Calloway. (amf, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cintas Corporation No. 2 (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 4602059634), filed by Jerlee Calloway. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Filing Fee Receipt)(amf, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jerlee Calloway. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #1 for PDF) (amf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Calloway v. Cintas Corporation No. 2 | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jerlee Calloway | |
Represented By: | Adam Michael Porter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cintas Corporation No. 2 | |
Represented By: | Ronald Bruce Barze, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.