Boone v. Corsino et al (MAG+)
Rufus A. Boone |
Mitzi Corsino and Zachary D. Corsino |
2:2020cv00835 |
October 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Emily C Marks |
Kelly F Pate |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1364 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be dismissedbefore service of process due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims; Objections to R&R due by 11/5/2020. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 10/22/2020. (djy, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing the clerk to STAY service of process so that the court may conduct its obligatory review of the plf's complaint under 28 US 1915(e). Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 10/21/2020. (djy, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kelly F. Pate for all pretrial proceedings and entry of any orders or recommendations as may be appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 10/19/2020. (djy, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rufus A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(kh, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mitzi Corsino, Zachary D. Corsino, filed by Rufus A. Boone. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(kh, ) (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/16/2020) (kh, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 10/16/2020) (kh, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.