Kister v. Lightner (INMATE 2)
| John Andrew Kister |
| Wanda Lightner |
| 2:2020cv00870 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Emily C Marks |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER TO FILE SPECIAL REPORT AND ANSWER on or before 1/5/2021; copies mailed to plaintiff; mailed by CMRRR with #1 complaint to the defendant; mailed by regular mail to ALDOC General Counsel & Attorney General for the State of AL. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 11/18/2020. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER ON MOTION: ORDER considering the #4 Motion as a Motion to Vacate Immediate Collection of the Initial Partial Filing Fee; it is ORDERED that: 1) Plaintiff's #4 motion is GRANTED to the extent addressed in this order; 2) The provision set forth in the #3 order, which requires payment of an initial partial filing fee is VACATED; 3) The remaining directives set forth in the #3 order - including the requirement regarding payment of the filing fee as funds become available to Plaintiff - remain in full force and effect; DIRECTING the Clerk to furnish a copy of this order to the inmate account clerk at the Bullock CF. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 11/18/2020. (Furnished: Cashier) (Copy furnished to Account Clerk as directed) (amf, )
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Pay Initial Partial Filing Fee When Funds Available by John Andrew Kister, CONSIDERED a Motion to Vacate Immediate Collection of the Initial Partial Filing Fee, pursuant to the Court's #5 Order (amf, ) Modified on 11/18/2020 (amf, ).
|
|
Filing 3
(PROVISION WHICH REQUIRES PAYMENT OF INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE IS VACATED) ORDER ON MOTION: granting #2 Affidavit for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order; directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $27.53 be paid on or before 11/19/2020; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until fee is paid in full; Copies mailed to plf and account clerk at the Bullock Correctional Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 10/29/2020. (furn: cashier) (cwl, ) Modified on 11/18/2020 (amf, ).
|
|
Filing 2
Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by John Andrew Kister. (es, )
|
|
Filing 1
Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Wanda Lightner, filed by John Andrew Kister.(es, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kister v. Lightner (INMATE 2) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Andrew Kister | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wanda Lightner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
