Miller v. Merchants Adjustment Service, Inc.
Ruth Miller |
Merchants Adjustment Service, Inc. |
2:2020cv01068 |
December 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Kelly F Pate |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by Ruth Miller (Philipps, David) |
Filing 10 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Complaint, #2 Conflict Disclosure Statement, #3 Motion, & #4 Motion, signed by Crystal Chesting for Merchants Adjustment Service, Inc., served on 1/4/2021, answer due 1/25/2021. (amf, ) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Elizabeth Philipps on behalf of Ruth Miller (Philipps, Mary) (Main Document 9 replaced on 1/6/2021 to attach a properly published PDF) (amf, ). Modified on 1/6/2021 (amf, ). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David Joseph Philipps on behalf of Ruth Miller (Philipps, David) (Main Document 8 replaced on 1/6/2021 to attach a properly published PDF) (amf, ). Modified on 1/6/2021 (amf, ). |
Filing 7 ORDER: it is ORDERED that the #3 and #4 motions are GRANTED and that Attorneys David J. Philipps and Mary E. Philipps are admitted pro hac vice as counsel for Plaintiff in this matter; Counsel should file a notice of appearance with the Court. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 1/6/2021. (amf, ) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Merchants Adjustment Service, Inc.; mailed by CMRRR with #1 Complaint, #2 Conflict Disclosure Statement, & #3 and #4 Motions. (amf, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Plaintiff Ruth Miller. (amf, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Mary E. Philipps (Filing fee $ 75.00, receipt number 4602060681) by Ruth Miller. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Receipt)(amf, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney David J. Philipps (Filing fee $ 75.00, receipt number 4602060680) by Ruth Miller. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Receipt)(amf, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Ruth Miller. (amf, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merchants Adjustment Service, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number 4602060679), filed by Ruth Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Filing Fee Receipt)(amf, ) |
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ruth Miller. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #1 for PDF) (amf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Miller v. Merchants Adjustment Service, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ruth Miller | |
Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
Represented By: | Bradford Wayne Botes |
Represented By: | David Joseph Philipps |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Merchants Adjustment Service, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.