United States of America v. $77,246.00 in United States Currency
United States of America |
$77,246.00 in United States Currency |
D'livro Lemat Beauchamp |
2:2020cv01069 |
December 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
R Austin Huffaker |
Susan Russ Walker |
Drug Related Seizure of Property |
21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CLAIM by D'livro Lemat Beauchamp. (dmn, ) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by $77,246.00 in United States Currency.(Wasdin, Chelsea) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Chelsea Lauren Wasdin on behalf of $77,246.00 in United States Currency (Wasdin, Chelsea) |
Filing 5 US Marshals ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed on 1/14/2021 to D'Livro L. Beauchamp thru Attorney Joe Reed on #1 Complaint, #3 Warrant Issued, and Notice. (dmn, ) |
Filing 4 US Marshals ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed on 1/14/2021 to Attorney Joe M. Reed on #1 Complaint, #3 Warrant, Notice. (dmn, ) |
Filing 3 WARRANT of of Arrest In Rem issued furnished to USMS for service. (amf, ) |
Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by United States of America. (djy, ) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM against $77,246.00 in United States Currency, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 notice of complaint for forfeiture, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 proposed warrant of arrest in rem)(djy, ) . |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.