Woodall v. Mobis Alabama, LLC
| Neketha Woodhall and Neketha Woodall |
| Mobis Alabama, LLC |
| 2:2021cv00090 |
| February 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Kelly F Pate |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons & #1 Complaint, signed by WR17 C19, for Mobis Alabama, LLC, served on 2/3/2021, answer due 4/5/2021. (amf, ) |
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Neketha Woodall. Mobis Alabama, LLC waiver sent on 2/3/2021, answer due 4/5/2021. (Arnold, Allen) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Mobis Alabama, LLC; mailed CMRRR with copy of #1 Complaint. (wcl, ) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Assignment to U.S. Magistrate Judge sent to counsel for Plaintiff Neketha Woodall. (amf, ) |
| Filing 2 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Neketha Woodall. (amf, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mobis Alabama, LLC (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number 4602061069), filed by Neketha Woodall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Request for Service by Certified Mail, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Filing Fee Receipt)(amf, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Neketha Woodall. (No PDF attached to this entry - See doc #1 for PDF) (amf, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
