Pickett v. Saul
Timothy Pickett |
Andrew Saul |
2:2021cv00184 |
March 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
Kelly F Pate |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #4 Order, #6 Summons not signed for Commissioner, served on 3/17/2021. (cwl, ) |
Filing 10 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #4 Order, #6 Summons signed by Emily S., for AG of the USA, served on 3/18/2021. (cwl, ) |
Filing 9 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #4 Order, #6 Summons signed by A. L. for Office of Regional Counsel, served on (no date given). (cwl, ) |
Filing 8 Return Receipt Card showing service of #1 Complaint, #4 Order, #6 Summons signed by L. S. for U. S. Attorney's office served on 3/10/2021, answer from Andrew Saul due 6/8/2021. (cwl, ) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Correction re #5 Order, to attach the correct order. (Attachments: #1 Correct Main doc entry #5 )(cwl, ) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney General, & Social Security Office of Regional Counsel; mailed by CMRRR with #1 Complaint & #4 Order. (amf, ) |
Filing 5 ORDER: it is ORDERED that the Motion for Leave for the Pro Hac Vice Admission of David B. Goetz, Esquire (Doc. #3 ), is GRANTED and that Attorney David B. Goetz is admitted pro hac vice as counsel for Plf in this matter. Counsel should file a notice of appearance with the Court. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 3/8/2021. (cwl, ) (Main Document 5 replaced on 3/8/2021 to attach the correct order) (cwl, ). Modified on 3/8/2021 to clarify text (cwl, ). |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER TO ANSWER Social Security Complaint within 90 days after the date of service of the complaint; plaintiff to file brief in support within 40 days of filing of the answer; defendant's reply brief and administrative record due within 30 days of brief filing. Copies mailed to counsel. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 3/8/2021. (cwl, ) |
Filing 3 Motion for David B Goetz to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 75.00 receipt number 4602062383.) by Timothy Pickett. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Receipt)(imm, ) Modified on 3/4/2021 to clarify text (cwl, ). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Timothy Pickett. (Attachments: #1 Application IFP)(imm, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Timothy Pickett. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(imm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pickett v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Timothy Pickett | |
Represented By: | David B Goetz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.