Jackson v. Gulati et al (INMATE 1)
| Frederick Jackson |
| Prem Gulati, Ruth Naglich, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Crestwood Hospital |
| 2:2021cv00236 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Stephen Michael Doyle |
| Emily C Marks |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the undersigned Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this case be transferred to the US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; Objections to R&R due by 5/18/2021. Signed by Honorable Judge Stephen Michael Doyle on 5/4/2021. (bes, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to File Lesser Number of Copies by Frederick Jackson. (es, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Frederick Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Motion IFP)(es, ) |
| Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Crestwood Hospital, Prem Gulati, Ruth Naglich, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., filed by Frederick Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Document - Complaint, #2 Attachment A, #3 Attachment B - Supporting Facts)(es, ) |
| MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Frederick Jackson. (No PDF document attached - see docket entry #1 ). (es, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Frederick Jackson.(No PDF document attached - see docket entry #1 ). (es, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
