Cargill v. U.S. Marshals et al (INMATE 3)
Plaintiff: Quincetta Cargill and Quincetta Y. Cargill
Defendant: U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice and U.S. Marshals
Case Number: 2:2021cv00285
Filed: April 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: W Harold Albritton
Referring Judge: Charles S Coody
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because plf has failed to comply with the Court's order that she pay the initial partial filing fee; Objections to R&R due by 6/18/2021. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/4/2021. (djy, )
April 30, 2021 Filing 4 Supplement (Grievance Committee) to #1 Inmate 1983 Complaint, by Quincetta Y. Cargill. (djy, )
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER directing payment of initial partial filing fee of $9.82 be paid on or before 5/6/2021 ; Directing Monthly Payments be made from Inmate's Prison Account until $350 fee is paid in full; granting #2 motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis except to the extent payment is required under this order. Copies mailed to plaintiff and account clerk at the Montgomery County Detention Facility. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 4/16/2021. Furnished to cashier. (djy, )
April 14, 2021 Filing 2 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Quincetta Y. Cargill. (hrs, )
April 14, 2021 Filing 1 Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Marshals, filed by Quincetta Y. Cargill.(hrs, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 4/16/2021 to correct erroneous main PDF document previously attached) (qc/djy, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cargill v. U.S. Marshals et al (INMATE 3)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Justice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Marshals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quincetta Cargill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quincetta Y. Cargill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?