Malloy v. Weller et al (INMATE 2)
| Arthur Brennan Malloy |
| Alabama Supreme Court, Julia Jordan Weller, Tom Parker and The Alabama Supreme Court |
| 2:2021cv00332 |
| May 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Emily C Marks |
| Kelly F Pate |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MOTION (Request) for Clarification of Magistrate Judge Report re #3 RECOMMENDATION by Arthur Brennan Malloy. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 4
OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by Arthur Brennan Malloy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(cwl, )
|
|
Filing 3
RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE: the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS: 1) Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis be DENIED; and 2) This case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee when the case was filed; Objections to R&R due by 5/28/2021. Signed by Honorable Judge Kelly F. Pate on 5/14/2021. (amf, )
|
|
Filing 2
Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit by Arthur Brennan Malloy. (es, )
|
|
Filing 1
Inmate 1983 COMPLAINT against Tom Parker, The Alabama Supreme Court, Julia Jordan Weller, filed by Arthur Brennan Malloy. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Disclaimer of Three Strikes Rule)(es, ) .
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
