Jones v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
Plaintiff: Antonio Devoe Jones
Defendant: Terry Raybon and Jefferson S. Dunn
Case Number: 2:2021cv00362
Filed: May 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Emily C Marks
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2021 Filing 11 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Petition, & #2 Order, signed by Barbara Baldwin for Jefferson S. Dunn, served on 6/3/2021, answer due 8/1/2021. (amf, )
June 9, 2021 Filing 10 Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement by Jefferson S. Dunn, Terry Raybon. (Jordan, Audrey Kathleen)
June 9, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Audrey Kathleen Jones Jordan on behalf of Jefferson S. Dunn, Terry Raybon (Jordan, Audrey Kathleen)
June 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: it is ORDERED that the #5 , #6 , and #7 motions to appear pro hac vice are GRANTED, and Attorneys Todd, Salazar, and Miller are ADMITTED to appear before this Court pro hac vice to represent the Petitioner in this action; Counsel shall file notices of appearance with the Court. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 6/9/2021. (amf, )
June 8, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION for Steven A. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 75.00, receipt number AALMDC-3030910) by Antonio Devoe Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Helmsing, Frederick)
June 8, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Natalie Salazar to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 75.00, receipt number AALMDC-3030905) by Antonio Devoe Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Helmsing, Frederick)
June 8, 2021 Filing 5 MOTION for Anthony R. Todd to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 75.00, receipt number AALMDC-3030897) by Antonio Devoe Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Helmsing, Frederick)
June 7, 2021 Filing 4 Return Receipt Card showing service of Summons, #1 Petition, & #2 Order, signed by O. Brown for Terry Raybon, served on 6/3/2021, answer due 8/1/2021. (amf, )
June 1, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Jefferson S. Dunn, Terry Raybon and mailed CMRRR with copy of complaint with attachments and #2 order. (djy, )
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER directing that: (1) the clerk serve copies of the petition, including attachments thereto, and this order on respondents, Jefferson Dunn and Terry Raybon by certified mail; (2) on or before 8/1/2021, respondent shall file an ANSWER pursuant to the provisions of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts; (3) On or before thirty days after Respondent files his answer or other responsive pleading, pursuant to Rule 5(e) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Petitioner shall file any reply he wishes to make to Respondent's answer or other responsive pleading; (4) on or before 8/1/2021, the entire record of this case shall be filed with the Clerk, as further set out in order; (5) Respondent shall use his best efforts to determine whether an electronic version of the transcript of any trial or collateral proceeding is available, and, if so, shall provide that to the Clerk of the Court in addition to the record required above; (6) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order via first class mail with a receipt acknowledgment card enclosed to (1) Petitioner, (2) Petitioner's counsel of record, and (3) Respondents counsel of record. Copy mailed to petitioner; mailed CMRRR w/copies of petition to Warden Terry Raybon & Commissioner Jefferson Dunn. Signed by Chief Judge Emily C. Marks on 6/1/21. (djy, ) Modified on 6/1/2021 to clarify text to reflect service on Terry Raybon and Jefferson Dunn (qc/djy, ).
May 19, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 receipt number 4602063404), filed by Antonio Devoe Jones. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents, #2 Exhibit 1 (Restricted, Privacy Issue), #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 receipt)(cwl, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/28/2021 to redact personal information contained in original filing pursuant to the E-government rules: #8 Exhibit 1 (Redacted)) (amf, ). Modified on 5/28/2021 (amf, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Dunn et al (DEATH PENALTY)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Devoe Jones
Represented By: Frederick George Helmsing, Jr.
Represented By: Anthony Todd
Represented By: Natalie Salazar
Represented By: Steven Alan Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terry Raybon
Represented By: Audrey Kathleen Jones Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn
Represented By: Audrey Kathleen Jones Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?